Appeal No. 2000-0502
Application No. 08/890,438
(lever) between the low- and high-range portions of the shift
pattern, such changes of position are not necessarily
indicative of the operator’s intent to shift between the low-
range and high-range ratios, as claimed.
The rejection will therefore be sustained.
Conclusion
The examiner’s decision to reject claims 21 to 26 is
affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007