Ex parte WALKER - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and         
                                                     is not precedent of the Board.                                              
                                                                                                       Paper No. 14              
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                      
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                       
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                  Ex parte JACK A. WALKER                                                        
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                      Appeal No. 2000-0528                                                       
                                                   Application No. 09/209,702                                                    
                                                          ____________                                                           
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                           
               Before STAAB, McQUADE and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
               BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                




                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 46, 47, 51, 55                  
               and 56, which are all of the claims pending in this application.1                                                 







                      1Claims 48-50, 52-54 and 57-59 were canceled in an amendment (Paper No. 7) filed subsequent to the final   
               rejection.                                                                                                        
                                                               1                                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007