Ex parte WALKER - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2000-0528                                                                                              
               Application No. 09/209,702                                                                                        


                                                       BACKGROUND                                                                
                      The appellant's invention relates to a planar board for use in fishing at least one fishing                
               line at a predetermined distance from a trolling boat.  An understanding of the invention can be                  
               derived from a reading of exemplary claims 46, 51 and 55, which appear in the appendix to the                     
               appellant's brief.                                                                                                
                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                   
               claims are:                                                                                                       
               Wille                                 4,028,840                             Jun. 14, 1977                         
               Anderson                              4,920,689                             May 1, 1990                           
               Reiger                                       5,867,932                             Feb. 9, 1999                   
                                                                                           (filed Sep. 23, 1996)                 
                      The following rejections are before us for review.                                                         
               (1)    Claims 46, 47, 51, 55 and 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                              
               anticipated by Wille.                                                                                             
               (2)    Claims 46, 47, 51, 55 and 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                              
               anticipated by Anderson.                                                                                          
               (3)    Claims 46, 47, 51, 55 and 56 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being                              
               anticipated by Reiger.                                                                                            
                      Reference is made to the brief (Paper No. 10) and the answer (Paper No. 11) for the                        
               respective positions of the appellant and the examiner with regard to the merits of these                         
               rejections.                                                                                                       

                                                               2                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007