Ex parte SIGMUNDSTAD - Page 11




          Appeal No. 2000-0560                                                        
          Application No. 08/578,636                                                  


               37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant,                    
          WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise              
          one of                                                                      
          the following two options with respect to the new ground of                 
          rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR                       
          § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                      
               (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims                      
               so rejected or a showing of facts relating to the                      
               claims so rejected, or both, and have the matter                       
               reconsidered by the examiner, in which event the                       
               application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                    
               (2) Request that the application be reheard under                      
               § 1.197(b) by the Board of Patent Appeals and                          
               Interferences upon the same record. . . .                              
               Should the appellant elect to prosecute further before                 
          the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in                   
          order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§               
          141 or 145 with respect to the affirmed rejection, the                      
          effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion               
          of the prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere                    
          incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed rejection is              
          overcome.                                                                   
               If the appellant elects prosecution before the examiner                
          and this does not result in allowance of the application,                   
                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007