Ex parte SPECTOR - Page 8




               Appeal No. 2000-0580                                                                                               
               Application No. 09/025,347                                                                                         


               accorded one who first viewed the appellant's disclosure.  Accordingly, we shall not sustain the                   
               examiner's rejection of independent claim 1 or claims 4-7 which depend therefrom.                                  
                                                        CONCLUSION                                                                
                      To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 and 4-7 under 35 U.S.C.                       
                103 is reversed.                                                                                                 
                                                          REVERSED                                                                






                                      LAWRENCE J. STAAB                             )                                             
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    ) BOARD OF PATENT                             
                                      JEFFREY V. NASE                               )     APPEALS                                 
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )       AND                                   
                                                                                    )  INTERFERENCES                              
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                                                                    )                                             
                                      JENNIFER D. BAHR                              )                                             
                                      Administrative Patent Judge                   )                                             







                                                                8                                                                 





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007