THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte UWE KLINGLER,
THOMAS SCHIEB, DIETMAR WASTIAN,
GERHARD WIECHERS, and JURGEN ZIMMERMAN
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0635
Application No. 08/511,0281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants seek review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10. We AFFIRM.
BACKGROUND
The claims are directed to a process for the production
of a dinitrotoluene isomer mixture. According to applicants,
"[n]one of the claims will be argued separately" (Paper 11
(App. Br.) at 3). "Because the claims are not separately
Application for patent filed 3 August 1995.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007