Ex parte JARVINEN - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                  Paper No. 35                        

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte PHILIP O. JARVINEN                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2000-0803                                  
                               Application 05/333,233                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before COHEN, ABRAMS and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

               This is a decision in an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-16, all the claims pending in the                     
          application.                                                                
               By way of background, this case has been pending since                 
          1973, with the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 13) having been                 
          entered in 1975.  Since then, the application has been subject              
          to a secrecy order, which has only recently been rescinded.                 

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007