Appeal No. 2000-0803
Application 05/333,233
Considering the examiner’s rejection of claim 5 further
in view of Smith, claim 10 further in view of Hess, claim 15
further in view of Strauss, and claim 16 further in view of
Kunins, we have carefully reviewed each of these additional
references but find nothing therein that makes up for the
deficiencies of Thompson, Schade, Hailstone and Bryan
discussed above. Therefore, we also will not sustain the
examiner’s rejections of these claims under § 103.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
)
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007