Ex parte TAIJONLAHTI et al. - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                                 Paper No. 21         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte JORMA TAIJONLAHTI                              
                                          and                                         
                                   MIKAEL OLLIKAINEN                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 2000-1354                                 
                              Application No. 08/894,129                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is an appeal from the refusal of the examiner to                  
          allow claims 14 to 33, as amended subsequent to the final                   
          rejection.  Claims 34 to 38, the only other claims pending in               
          this application, have been withdrawn from consideration under              
          37 CFR  1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention.                 


               We REVERSE.                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007