Ex parte TAIJONLAHTI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1354                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/894,129                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellants' invention relates to a sheet metal work                
          center (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under                   
          appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.               


               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Morita                   5,325,755                     July 5,              
          1994                                                                        



               Claims 14 to 33 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)                
          as being anticipated by Morita.                                             


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejection, we make reference to the first Office action (Paper              
          No. 6, mailed July 24, 1998) and the answer (Paper No. 18,                  
          mailed October 25, 1999) for the examiner's complete reasoning              
          in support of the rejection, and to the brief (Paper No. 17,                
          filed October 4, 1999) and reply brief (Paper No. 19, filed                 
          December 21, 1999) for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007