Ex parte WAGNER et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2000-1475                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 08/844,016                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               As set forth in the SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION section of                
          the brief (Paper No. 16, filed November 22, 1999), the                      
          appellants' invention                                                       
               relates to a method [and] apparatus for controlling the                
               brake system of a vehicle by regulatory brake pressure                 
               based on the inlet pressure set by the driver and                      
               correction value which provides a driver's wish value,                 
               which in turn determines the control on the regulatory                 
               means. Prior art apparatuses attempt to the applied force              
               which is determined by measuring the inlet pressure                    
               (i.e., pressure in the main brake cylinder), however this              
               does not coincide in every operating situation with the                
               force actually applied by the foot. Thus, Applicants'                  
               claimed method and apparatus, being substantially free of              
               these disadvantages, and provides a significant advance                
               over other apparatuses for which do not regulate the                   
               brake pressure based on the inlet pressure set by the                  
               driver.                                                                

          Claim 1 on appeal is set forth in the AMENDMENT UNDER RULE 116              
          (Paper No. 10).  Claims 11 to 13 on appeal are set forth in                 
          the AMENDMENT UNDER RULE 111 (Paper No. 7, filed December 28,               
          1998).  Claims 2 to 10 on appeal have not been amended.                     


               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Rivard et al. (Rivard)        5,487,598                Jan. 30,             
          1996                                                                        







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007