The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GERALD W. HALL
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1622
Application No. 08/752,445
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 66
to 68, 70, 72 and 75 to 86, all the claims remaining in the
application.
The claims on appeal are drawn to a waste discharge
system, and are reproduced in the appendix of appellant’s
brief.1
1All references herein to appellant’s brief are to the
Supplemental Appeal Brief filed on Sept. 3, 1999.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007