Ex parte KAMBOJ et al.; Ex parte FOLDES et al. - Page 29


                  Appeal No.  2000-1779                                                                                        
                  Application No.  08/473,204                                                                                  
                          We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claims 26, 27, 40, 45, and 47-52                              
                  under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Egebjerg in view of either Sun or                           
                  Puckett.                                                                                                     
                          We reverse the examiner’s rejection of claim 28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                             
                  being unpatentable over Egebjerg, Puckett, and Sun as applied to claim 26, 27, 40,                           
                  45, and 47-52 and further in view of Cutting.                                                                


                                                        REVERSED                                                               






























                                                              29                                                               



Page:  Previous  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007