Interference No. 103,029 have prevented the senior party from developing evidence to support an allegation of derivation before the date on which the request to amend the preliminary statement was filed. First, the senior party points to the stipulations that were filed by the parties on December 23, 1993. These stipulations were developed and signed by the parties on December 16 and 17, 1993 in order to obviate a motion for additional discovery filed by Barnhouse and withdrawn concurrently with the filing of the stipulations. According to Barnhouse, the stipulations represent the first concrete evidence that the samples used by Federl and Kipouras in the set(s) of experiments as reported in comparative examples C1 to C5 and C10 and as examples 6-9 of U.S. Patent 4,588,773 and the set of experiments reported in table VI in KX-15 were the copolymer samples furnished to Borg-Warner via Barnhouse from Goodrich. The following represents our findings of fact with regard to the motions to amend the preliminary statement. Beginning about 18 months before the filing of the Federl application, Barnhouse was supplying ECH/EO to Federl and 24Page: Previous 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007