THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 45
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CONAN KORNETSKY
__________
Appeal No. 1995-1990
Application 08/006,691
__________
HEARD: May 4, 2000
__________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON, and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges,
ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 7, 12-14, 16-19 and 21-22. Claim 15 has been indicated
allowable by the examiner in the Office action of May 31, 1994. (Paper No. 31). In the
Office action of February 10, 2000, (Paper No. 42), the examiner withdrew the rejections
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007