Ex parte ALSOP et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1995-3232                                                                                        
              Application 07/954,686                                                                                      



                                              REPRESENTATIVE CLAIM                                                        
                     Claim 41, which is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal, reads as follows:                   
                     41.  A method of treatment of a human requiring dialysis of the serum by use of an                   
              aqueous solution of a physiologically acceptable mixture of glucose polymers derived from                   
              the hydrolysis of starch, wherein at least 50% by weight of said mixture comprises                          
              polymers having molecular weights in the range of from 5,000 to 30,000, and wherein said                    
              mixture has a weight average molecular weight of from 5,000 to 50,000, and a number                         
              average molecular weight of from 2,890 to 8,000 [emphasis added].                                           

                                           THE PRIOR ART REFERENCE                                                        
                     In rejecting the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the examiner relies on                       
              the following reference:                                                                                    
              Milner                       4,886,789                   Dec. 12, 1989                                      

                                                     THE ISSUES                                                           
                     The previously entered rejection of claims 41, 42 and 44 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                    
              described by Milner has been withdrawn.  See the Examiner's Answer, page 2, section (4).                    
              The issues remaining for review are:                                                                        
                     (1) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claim 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                    
              paragraph, as based on a specification which does not provide adequate, written                             
              descriptive support for the invention now claimed; and                                                      




                                                            2                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007