Appeal No. 1995-3232
Application 07/954,686
(2) whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 41, 42 and 44 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as unpatentable over Milner.
DELIBERATIONS
Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the following
materials:
(1) the instant specification, including Figures 1 through 5 and all of the claims on
appeal;
(2) applicants' main Brief (Paper No. 44), Reply Brief (Paper No. 46), and
Supplemental Reply Brief (Paper No. 50);
(3) the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 45), the communication mailed by the
examiner August 30, 1994 (Paper No. 47), the Supplemental Examiner's Answer (Paper
No. 49), and the communication mailed May 12, 1999 (Paper No. 52); and
(4) the above-cited Milner reference.
On consideration of the record, including the above-listed materials, we reverse
both of the examiner's rejections.
35 U.S.C. § 112, FIRST PARAGRAPH
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007