THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 53
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WOLFGANG WANZKE, GUNTER SIEGEMUND
and WILFRIED SCHMIEDER
____________
Appeal No. 1996-0532
Application 08/080,4491
____________
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
____________
Before WINTERS, GRON, and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.
Application for patent filed June 21, 1993. According1
to applicant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/954,412, filed September 30, 1992, now abandoned; which is a
continuation of Application 07/580,588, filed September 11, 1990,
now abandoned. Applicants also claim the benefit under 35 U.S.C.
§ 119 of the September 13, 1989, filing date of Fed. Rep. Germany
P 39 30 507.4.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007