THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte GEORG FOLZ AND THEODOR PAPENFUHS
________________
Appeal No. 1996-0716
Application 08/107,6611
________________
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
________________
Before METZ, JOHN DOUGLAS SMITH and DELMENDO, Administrative
Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Appellants request rehearing under 37 C.F.R. § 1.197(b)
(see Paper Number 26) of our decision mailed July 27, 2000
(Paper Number 25), wherein we affirmed the rejection of claims
1 through 10 and 13 through 15, all the claims remaining in
this application. In affirming the examiner's rejection of the
Application for patent filed August 12, 1993, and1
filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007