THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 17 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DONALD P. HART, JR. and ROBERT C. STROUP __________ Appeal No. 1996-0837 Application 08/043,062 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before CAROFF, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 57 and 88, all the claims remaining in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 1. A printing coating composition for forming a decorative coating on a substrate comprising: (A) (i) at least one homopolymer of ethylene having a melt index of at least about 220 grams per ten minutes as determined by ASTM D1238, condition 190/2.16, or (ii) atPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007