Ex parte HART et al. - Page 1





                             THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                               

              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for                        
              publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                               
                                                                             Paper No. 17                               

                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                     __________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                     __________                                                         
                                          Ex parte DONALD P. HART, JR.                                                  
                                             and ROBERT C. STROUP                                                       
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 1996-0837                                                    
                                                Application 08/043,062                                                  
                                                     __________                                                         
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                     __________                                                         
              Before CAROFF, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
              ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                       

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                       
                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of                     
              claims 1, 57 and 88, all the claims remaining in the application.                                         
                     Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                      
                     1.  A printing coating composition for forming a decorative coating on a substrate                 
              comprising:                                                                                               
                     (A) (i) at least one homopolymer of ethylene having a melt index of at least about                 
              220 grams per ten minutes as determined by ASTM D1238, condition 190/2.16, or (ii) at                     






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007