Ex parte HART et al. - Page 2




              Appeal No. 1996-0837                                                                                      
              Application 08/603,014                                                                                    


              least one copolymer of ethylene and a second ethylenically unsaturated monomer having a                   
              melt index of at least about 20 grams per ten minutes as determined by ASTM D1238,                        
              condition 190/2.16, or (iii) at least one thermoplastic acrylic homopolymer or copolymer                  
              having a glass transition temperature (Tg) of greater than 0EC but less than 110EC, or (iv)               
              a mixture of (i), (ii), and (ii) [sic, iii];                                                              
                     (B) at least one thermoplastic polymeric material different than (A) having a melting              
              point in the range of about 0EC to about 130EC and being dispersible with (A) wherein the                 
              polymer composition of (A) and (B) is normally solid at room temperature but is a viscous                 
              liquid at about 200EF to about 300EF having a viscosity in the range of about 5,000 cps to                
              about 100,000 cps; and                                                                                    
                     (C) an adhesion promoter, said adhesion promoter comprising an epoxy resin.                        

                     The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                                    
              Cleveland et al. (Cleveland)              4,454,379            June 12, 1984                              
              Couturier et al. (Couturier)       4,870,128            Sep. 26, 1989                                     

                     Claims 1, 57 and 88 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable                     
              over Couturier in view of Cleveland.                                                                      
                     We reverse.                                                                                        
                     As indicated by claim 1 above, the appellants’ invention is directed to thermoplastic              
              compositions of a “specific formulation of very specific components having specific                       
              physical properties.”  Specification, p. 8.  The claimed compositions are said to be useful               
              for providing a decorative coating on substrates such as “glass, ceramic, metal,                          
              fiberboard, textile or plastic (e.g., glass [sic] jars or bottles) preferably using hot melt              
              screen printing.”  Id., p. 6.                                                                             

                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007