THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte PAUL C. ANDERSON and
KENNETH A. HIBBERD
__________
Appeal No. 1996-0963
1
Application 07/947,249
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed September 18, 1992. According to appellants, this
application is a continuation of application 07/592,420, filed October 3, 1990, now U.S.
Patent No. 5,304,732, which is a continuation of application 06/900,960, filed August 28,
1986, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of application 06/639,321, filed
August 10, 1984, now U.S. Patent No. 4,761,373, which is a continuation-in-part of
application 06/586,802, filed March 6, 1984, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007