Ex parte BACCINI - Page 2




          Appeal No.  1996-1244                                      Page 2           
          Application No.  08/082,782                                                 


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant's invention relates to a device for processing               
          foils for green-tape circuits. The claimed device includes                  
          several structural elements including, inter alia,(1) a                     
          plurality of containers of supports for the foils, (2) a                    
          conveyor means for transporting the foils, (3) moveable                     
          carriage means for withdrawing the supports in a programmed                 
          manner, (4) a discharge or removal station wherein the                      
          supports may be removed from the foils,(5) an alignment                     
          station wherein the foils may be aligned, and (6) a                         
          superimposing and anchoring station wherein a number of the                 
          foils may be superimposed and anchored to one another.                      
          According to appellant's specification at pages 1 and 2, the                
          green-tape foils have a "thickness of the order of 0.1 - 0.5                
          mm"  and consist of:                                                        
               ceramics pre-fired at a low temperature and                            
               containing glass fibers and possessing designed                        
               properties of viscosity and temperature, the foils                     
               consisting also of refractory materials used as                        
               fillers so as to be able to comply with the                            
               coefficient of thermal expansion of the alumina.                       
               Appellant alleges that the foils possess no rigidity and               
          require a support for their handling (specification, page 2).               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007