Appeal No. 1996-1244 Page 3
Application No. 08/082,782
The foils are described as having a printed circuit on one or
both of their faces (specification, page 3). The claimed
device serves to handle these foils so as to superimpose a
number of them to form an anchored product that comprises a
multi-layer pack
(specification, page 2). A further understanding of the
claimed invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary
claim 1, which is reproduced below.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Mintz 4,149,925 Apr. 17,
1979
Nakamura 4,599,122 Jul. 08,
1986
Claims 1-8 and 10-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Mintz. Claims 9 and 21 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Mintz as applied to claims 1-8 and 10-20, further in view of
Nakamura.
OPINION
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007