Ex parte IKEDA et al. - Page 1




                                  THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                     
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
                                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                                         Paper No. 30              

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                            
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                     Ex parte NAOKI IKEDA, MASAFUMI YOSHIMURA,                                                     
                                       KAZUAKI MIZOGUCHI, HIROSHI KITAGAWA,                                                        
                                         YUJI KAWASHIMA, KIYOSHI SADAMITSU                                                         
                                                  and YASUYUKI KAWAHARA                                                            
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                                      Appeal No. 1996-1372                                                         
                                                    Application No. 08/003,6591                                                    
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                                      HEARD: June 10, 1999                                                         
                                                           ____________                                                            

               Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               



                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims            

               1 through 10 and 12 through 22, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claims 1, 21              

               and 22 are illustrative and a copy of these claims are appended to this decision.                                   


                       Application for patent filed January 13, 1993.1                                                                                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007