Appeal No. 1996-1418
Application No. 08/247,521
character. Accordingly, we cannot sustain the anticipation
rejection of claim 6.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 7
under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is affirmed as to claims 4, 5, and 7/(4,
5) and reversed as to claims 1 through 3, 6, and 7/(1-3, 6).
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP )
Administrative Patent Judge )
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007