THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TAMAS JANAKY, ATTILA JUHASZ, SANDOR BAJUSZ
and ANDREW V. SCHALLY
__________
Appeal No. 1996-2431
1
Application 08/008,186
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, ROBINSON and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1
through 23, all the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed January 25, 1993. According to appellants, this
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/505,517, filed April 6, 1990, now
abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/404,667, filed September 7,
1989, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/260,994, filed
October 21, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007