Appeal No. 1996-2431 Application 08/008,186 Accordingly, we find that the examiner’s initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of obviousness has not been met. On this record, we reverse the rejections of the 4 claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103. REVERSED ) SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT DOUGLAS ROBINSON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) TONI R. SCHEINER ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 4Having determined that a prima facie case of obviousness has not been established, we do not find it necessary to comment on the declaration of Dr. Tetsu Yano (submitted July 31, 1995, under 37 CFR § 1.132), or appellants’ arguments regarding unexpected results attributable to an embodiment of the present invention. 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007