Appeal No. 1996-2470 Application 08/192,488 Ayres et al. (Ayres ‘718) 5,096,718 Mar. 17, 1992 Ott et al. (Ott) 5,139,777 Aug. 18, 1992 Ayres et al. (Ayres ‘061) 5,260,061 Nov. 9, 1993 Dialog abstract no. 0690163 of A. Kemp et al. (Kemp), “Nitrate poisoning in cattle. 2. Changes in nitrate in rumen fluid and methemoglobin formation in blood after high nitrate intake”, 25 Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 51-62 (1977). THE REJECTIONS Claims 7-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Tomes, Ott, Ayres ‘718, Ayres ‘061 and Kemp.2 OPINION We have carefully considered all of the arguments advanced by appellants and the examiner and agree with appellants that the aforementioned rejections are not well founded. Accordingly, we reverse these rejections. Tomes discloses a method for preserving silage by 2 The examiner’s discussion of the rejection indicates that the references are applied separately. There is no discussion of how any reference is used to remedy a deficiency in any other reference. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007