THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ALFRED G. BARNET and MERRILL R. MEZIKOFSKY __________ Appeal No. 1996-2732 Application 08/241,524 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before GRON, ELLIS and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. Per curiam DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 9 through 18. Claims 1 through 8 have been canceled. Claim 9 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows: 9. In a shaving composition in the form of a self-foaming gel comprising water, a water-soluble soap, and a volatile hydrocarbon self-foaming agent, the improvement wherein said shaving composition additionally comprises a fluorosurfactant and a hydrogenated polyisobutene.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007