Ex parte BARNET et al. - Page 9




                  Appeal No. 1996-2732                                                                                                                    
                  Application 08/241,524                                                                                                                  
                  Serving to correct physical imperfections ‹cosmetic surgery› 3. b. Ornamental rather than                                               
                  functional.  b. Having little or no significance : superficial ‹ cosmetic changes in                                                    
                  procedures›.”  Websters II, New Riverside University Dictionary, The Riverside                                                          
                  Publishing Company (1988), p. 316.  [Copy attached].  The examiner has not provided any                                                 
                  explanation as to how the claimed shaving gels are related to the cosmetics industry.                                                   
                           Nor do I find that Aronson relates to the same problem addressed by the present                                                
                  invention.  The claimed compositions are said to provide a comfortable shave by                                                         
                  exhibiting attributes such as softening of the beard, avoiding nicks and cuts, improving                                                
                  razor glide and giving the perception of facial cleanliness after shaving.  Specification, p.                                           
                  8.  In contrast, the teachings of Aronson are directed to improving the stability of HIPE’s by                                          
                  the incorporation of an electrolyte into the aqueous phase of the emulsion.  Aronson, col. 8,                                           
                  lines 27-30.                                                                                                                            
                           Thus, in addition to the many fine points set forth above by the panel, I find the                                             
                  examiner’s reliance on Aronson to be misplaced.  In my view, a person of ordinary skill in                                              
                  this art would not have been expected to turn to Aronson to look for lubricants to add to                                               
                  shaving cream gels.  Accordingly, I find that the examiner’s combining of elements from a                                               
                  non-analogous source, in a manner that reconstructs the applicant’s invention to be                                                     
                  improper.  In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d at 1447, 24 USPQ2d at 1446.                                                                          






                                                                            9                                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007