THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GERALD L. BAUER and WILLIAM VES CHILDS
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2809
Application No. 08/399,961
____________
HEARD: January 24, 2000
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 20 which are all of the claims
pending in the application.
Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal
and reads as follows:
1. An electrochemical cell for the production of fluorine,
comprising:
(1) a cell housing;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007