Ex parte BAUER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1996-2809                                                        
          Application No. 08/399,961                                                  


          Saprokhin et al. (Saprokhin)            4,511,440           Apr.            
          16, 1985                                                                    
          Marshall                           2 135 335 A    Aug. 30, 1984             
          (Published Great Britain Patent Application)                                
               The references of record relied upon by appellants are:                
          Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia, 6th ed., Considine et               
          al., 1983, page 484 (hereinafter referred to as “Considine”).               
          Techniques of Chemistry, Vol. V, Part III, “Technique of                    
          Electroorganic Synthesis,” Weinberg, 1982, page 375                         
          (hereinafter referred to as “Weinberg”).                                    
               The appealed claims stand rejected as follows:                         
          (1) Claims 10 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph,                  
          “as failing to provide an adequate written description of the               
          invention”;                                                                 
          (2)  Claims 1 through 3, 6, and 8 through 11 under 35 U.S.C.                
          103 as unpatentable over Saprokhin in combination with                      
          Tricoli;                                                                    
          (3) Claims 4, 5 and 12 through 18 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as                    
          unpatentable over Saprokhin in combination with Tricoli “as                 
          applied to claims 1-3[, 6] and 8-11 above, and further in view              
          of Ashe...”;                                                                
          (4) Claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as unpatentable over                        
          Saprokhin in combination with Tricoli “as applied to claims 1-              
          3, 6, and 8-11 above, and further in view of Ruehlen...”; and               
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007