Appeal No. 1996-2844
Application No. 07/955,162
Claim 1 is illustrative:
1. A phosphate-free, substantially anhydrous anti-
corrosive antifreeze formulation suitable for use as coolant
in an engine cooling system without water dilution consisting
essentially of:
(WT%)
COMPONENT CONCENTRATION RANGE
Propylene Glycol 92 to 98
Borate, calculated as B 0 0.16 to 0.81
4 7
Molybdate, calculated as Mo0 0.13 to 0.66
4
Nitrate, calculated as N0 0.073 to 0.36
3
Nitrite, calculated as N0 0.067 to 0.33
2
Tolyltriazole (C H N ) 0.15 to 0.50
77 3
Silicate, calculated as Si0 0.014 to 0.07
2
As culled from the examiner’s Answer (Paper No. 15) and
Supplemental Answer (Paper No. 18), the posture of this appeal
is as follows:
Ž all of the rejections previously applied in the
final rejection have been withdrawn by the examiner.
Ž the only outstanding rejections are those which were
applied as new grounds of rejection in the examiner’s Answer.
Ž the paper styled "Amendment" filed on Nov. 25, 1994
(Paper No. 16) is treated as a Reply Brief responding to the
new grounds of rejection.
Ž the only other claim pending in appellant’s
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007