Ex parte HECKEROTH et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1996-2958                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/150,053                                                                                                             


                 restriction area                    to be secured, a traffic restriction area                                                          
                 being an area                       along a blocked stretch of roadway in which                                                        
                 traffic is                 restricted by the light signalling equipment,                                                               
                 the method                 comprising:                                                                                                 
                                   sensing traffic and measuring the transit times of                                                                   
                          vehicles over a measured distance extending substantially                                                                     
                          along the traffic restriction area to be secured with the                                                                     
                          sensor controls;                                                                                                              
                                   determining the clearance time as a function of the                                                                  
                          transit time measurements obtained; and                                                                                       
                                   controlling the light signaling equipment to                                                                         
                 regulate                   traffic in the traffic restriction area to be                                                               
                 secured based                       on the determined clearance time.                                                                  
                          The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                                                                               
                 Marcy                                        4,390,951                                             Jun. 28,                            
                 1983                                                                                                                                   
                 Kishi                                        5,252,969                                             Oct. 12,                            
                 1993                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                         (Filed Jun. 18, 1991)                                          
                          Claims 1 through 7 and 11 through 17 stand finally                                                                                                                    
                 rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                                                              
                 Marcy in view of Kishi.                                                                                                                
                          Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants                                                                                                                            
                 and the Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs  and Answers                          1                                              

                          1The Appeal brief was filed November 29, 1995.  In                                                                            
                 response to the Examiner’s Answer dated March 20, 1996, a                                                                              
                 Reply brief was filed May 20, 1996.  The Examiner entered the                                                                          
                 Reply Brief and submitted a Supplemental Examiner’s Answer on                                                                          
                 July 19, 1996.  A Supplemental Reply Brief filed by Appellants                                                                         
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007