THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JACK DEBRAUWERE, JEAN-MARIE MATHIAS
and INDRAJIT PATEL
________________
Appeal No. 1996-2963
Application 07/952,427
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before GARRIS, OWENS and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1-22 and 31. Claims 23-30 have been indicated
as allowable by the examiner in the final rejection mailed
April 03, 1995. The examiner (answer, page 2) withdrew the
outstanding rejections involving claim 32, the only other
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007