Ex parte DOUCHE et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was     
               not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding    
               precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                 Paper No. 29         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                    Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE DOUCHE and PHILIPPE ARMAND                   
                                 Appeal No. 1996-2972                                 
                              Application No. 07/928,784                              
                               HEARD: February 07, 2000                               
          Before, KIMLIN, GARRIS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal               
          to allow claims 1, 3-6, and 13-17 as amended after the final                
          rejection, which are all of the claims pending in this                      
               The appellants’ invention relates to a process of                      
          duplicate molding wherein first and second glazings are each                
          positioned, respectively, in a separate mold associated                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007