THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JEAN-PIERRE DOUCHE and PHILIPPE ARMAND
____________
Appeal No. 1996-2972
Application No. 07/928,784
____________
HEARD: February 07, 2000
____________
Before, KIMLIN, GARRIS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1, 3-6, and 13-17 as amended after the final
rejection, which are all of the claims pending in this
application.
BACKGROUND
The appellants’ invention relates to a process of
duplicate molding wherein first and second glazings are each
positioned, respectively, in a separate mold associated
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007