Appeal No. 1996-3121
Application No. 08/115,783
7, 9, and 14 for obviousness is affirmed. The examiner’s
rejection of appealed claims 4, 5, 8, 13, and 15 for
obviousness is reversed. Accordingly, the decision of the
examiner is affirmed-in-part.
No period for taking any subsequent action in connection
with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN D. SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES F. WARREN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
13
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007