THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 47
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte OSAMU YOKOMIZO, YUICHIRO YOSHIMOTO, YOSHIYUKI KATAOKA,
SHINICHI KASHIWAI, YASUHIRO MASUHARA, AKIO TOMIYAMA, AKIHITO
ORII, KOTARO INOUE, TAKAAKI MOCHIDA, and TATSUO HAYASHI
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3167
Application No. 07/974,8341
____________
HEARD: January 13, 2000
____________
Before FRANKFORT, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 4, 6, 7, 13, 14, 26, 28 to 31, 34, 35 and
41 to 52. Claims 3, 5, 8, 9, 12, 15 to 22, 32, 33 and 36 to
38 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR §
1Application for patent filed November 16, 1992 (Attorney
Docket No. 501.25507CC2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007