Appeal No. 1996-3167 Page 7
Application No. 07/974,834
rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper
No. 28, mailed March 21, 1994) and the answer (Paper No. 41,
mailed October 11, 1995) for the examiner's complete reasoning
in support of the rejections, and to the brief (Paper No. 40,
filed June 16, 1995) and reply brief (Paper No. 43, filed
December 11, 1995) for the appellants' arguments thereagainst.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have given
careful consideration to the appellants' specification and
claims, to the applied prior art references, and to the
respective positions articulated by the appellants and the
examiner. As a consequence of our review, we make the
determinations which follow.
The indefiniteness rejection
We will not sustain the rejection of claims 4, 6, 7, 13,
14, 26, 28 to 31, 34, 35 and 41 to 52 under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007