Ex parte LEHTONEN - Page 1




                              THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                 

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
                                           and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                                                                 Paper No. 22              
                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                               Ex parte PAAVO LEHTONEN                                                     
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                  Appeal No. 1996-3318                                                     
                                                Application No. 08/287,0561                                                
                                                      ____________                                                         
                                                         ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                         
              Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH, and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
              SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        


                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through                  
              8, which are all of the claims pending in this application.  Claim 1 is illustrative and reads               
              as follows.                                                                                                  
                            1.  A process of combatting micro-organisms contained in industrial                            
                     processes, comprising adding glucose oxidase and optionally glucose or a                              
                     source of glucose to industrial process waters or slurries.                                           


                     1Application for patent filed August 8, 1994.  According to appellant, this application is a          
              continuation of application 07/852,129 filed June 15, 1992, now abandoned.                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007