THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LEE A. CARMAN
and SHUYUAN LIU
__________
Appeal No. 1996-3472
Application 08/192,088
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 5 and 7. Claim
6 is the only remaining claim in this application and has been
objected to by the examiner as depending on a rejected base
claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form
including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims (Answer, page 1).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007