Appeal No. 1996-3472
Application 08/192,088
as superior to conventional alumina by Rue and Cottringer.
The examiner should also consider, in detail, the comparative
data presented by appellants on pages 12-18 of the
specification. Specifically, the examiner should determine if
the variable firing schedule recited in Table III on page 13
of the specification would affect the results presented in
Table IV on page 14 of the specification (see the sentence
bridging pages 8-9 of the specification) and if all of the
results for the example from Clark composition #4 are
truly unexpected (see the specification, pages 16 and Table
VII on page 18).
REVERSED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007