Ex parte KAURAGAKI - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.           
                                                                 Paper No. 32         


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                              Ex parte NAOYOSHI KAURAGAKI                             
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1996-3675                                 
                              Application No. 08/259,933                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: November 16, 2000                               
                                     ____________                                     


          Before JOHN D. SMITH, WARREN, and DELMENDO, Administrative                  
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                  
          from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1, 2, 8, 11, 15,                
          and 16 as amended subsequent to the final rejection.  The                   
          examiner indicated that claims 4 through 6, 9, 10, and 12                   
          through 14, which are the only other claims pending in the                  
          application, “would be allowable in independent form” (Paper                
          19; advisory action of August 23, 1995).                                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007