THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HARUKAZU MIYAMOTO, TOSHIO NIIHARA,
MOTOYASU TERAO, NORIO OHTA and
MASAAKI KUREBAYASHI
_____________
Appeal No. 1996-3787
Application 07/607,870
______________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 9, 2000
_______________
Before PAK, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 38, 39 and 41 through 47 which are all
of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 41, 42 and
43 were amended subsequent to the final Office action dated
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007