Ex parte SHARMA - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          

                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication                 
                       in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                                        Paper No. 39                  
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                   Ex parte YASH P. SHARMA                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal No. 1996-3794                                                            
                                                   Application No. 08/212,698                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                          ____________                                                                
               Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                


                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims                            
               13 through 22 and 26 through 34 which are all the claims in the application.                                           
                                                         THE INVENTION                                                                

                       The invention is directed to a composition for use in the disinfection of a blood                              
               sample or a blood component sample, and in a method for disinfecting a blood sample or                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007