Ex parte SHARMA - Page 1




                                THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                          

                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication                 
                       in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                
                                                                                                        Paper No. 39                  
                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                   Ex parte YASH P. SHARMA                                                            
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal No. 1996-3794                                                            
                                                   Application No. 08/212,698                                                         
                                                          ____________                                                                
                                                             ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                          ____________                                                                
               Before OWENS, LIEBERMAN, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
               LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                


                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               

                       This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims                            
               13 through 22 and 26 through 34 which are all the claims in the application.                                           
                                                         THE INVENTION                                                                

                       The invention is directed to a composition for use in the disinfection of a blood                              
               sample or a blood component sample, and in a method for disinfecting a blood sample or                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007