Ex parte SHARMA - Page 2




               Appeal No. 1996-3794                                                                          Page 2                   
               Application No. 08/212,698                                                                                             


               blood component sample.  The composition consists essentially of an anionic surfactant, at                             
               least one non-anionic surfactant, a stabilizer and a buffer solution.                                                  
                                                           THE CLAIMS                                                                 

                       Claim 13 is illustrative of appellant’s invention and is reproduced below.                                     
                       13.     A composition for use in the disinfection of a blood or blood component                                
               sample, wherein said sample is contained in a blood bag and wherein said composition                                   
               controls hemolysis of and maintains the chemical and physical characteristics of the cells                             
               present in said sample such that said sample can be used for a transfusion, said                                       
               composition consisting essentially of, in combination, an anionic surfactant, at least one                             
               non-anionic surfactant, a stabilizer, and a buffer solution.                                                           

                                               THE REFERENCES OF RECORD                                                               

               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon the following reference.                                          
               Hicks et al. (Hicks) “The Lancet” pp. 1422-1423, (Dec. 21/28, 1985).                                                   
                                                        THE REJECTIONS                                                                

                       Claims 13 through 22 and 26 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                 
               being unpatentable over Hicks.                                                                                         
                       Claims 13 through 22 and 26 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                             
               paragraph, as failing to adequately teach how to make and/or use the invention.                                        
                       Claims 13 through 22 and 26 through 34 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,                                   
               second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim                       
               the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention.                                                           









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007