Ex parte SARIN - Page 7




             Appeal No. 1996-3806                                                                                 
             Application 08/183,152                                                                               


                                          Rejections over Sastri                                                  
                    Sastri discloses coatings which are characterized by a                                        
             microcrystalline, single-phase, solid solution structure with                                        
             metalloids dissolved therein (col. 2, lines 17-21).  The                                             
             portion of Sastri relied upon by the examiner is Sastri’s                                            
             disclosure of prior art “hardfacing alloy coatings which are                                         
             characterized by their two-phase structures comprising (1) a                                         
             coarse grained (typically between 10 to 100 microns), face-                                          
             centered-cubic, cobalt-based, continuous phase and (2) a                                             
             randomly dispersed second phase of carbide, boride, etc.,                                            
             particles which are generally between about 1 to 10 microns in                                       
             size” (col. 5, lines 5-12).                                                                          
                    The examiner argues that “Sastri discloses that the                                           
             claimed WC-Cr composite coatings on ceramics such as alumina                                         
             are known (column 5, lines 5-15)” (answer, page 2).  The                                             
             portion of Sastri relied upon by the examiner, however, does                                         
             not mention WC or                                                                                    




             alumina.  Appellant argues that the prior art crystalline                                            
             cobalt referred to by Sastri is not a binder (brief, page 10).                                       
                                                      -7-7                                                        





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007