THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIRK MEERSSCHAUT and GODFRIED VANNESTE
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3859
Application No. 08/278,9101
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow
claims 19-32 and 35-38 as amended after final rejection.
These are all of the claims remaining in the application.
THE INVENTION
Appellants’ claimed invention is directed toward a
process for heat treating and then cooling steel wire such
1Application for patent filed July 22, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007