Ex parte TEXTER et al. - Page 1




                          THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                        
                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                       
                   today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                         
                   journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                     
                                                                       Paper No. 24                           

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                            ________________                                                  
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                            ________________                                                  
                            Ex parte JOHN TEXTER and ROLAND G. WILLIS                                         
                                            ________________                                                  
                                          Appeal No. 1996-3955                                                
                                        Application 08/170,601                                                
                                            ________________                                                  
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                            ________________                                                  
            Before JOHN D. SMITH, OWENS and LIEBERMAN, Administrative                                         
            Patent Judges.                                                                                    
            OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                   This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of                                   
            claims 1-14, 16, 17, 19 and 21-26.  Claim 15, which is the                                        
            only other claim remaining in the application, stands objected                                    
            to as being dependent from a rejected claim.                                                      


                                                     -1-1                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007